Dr. Marc Siegel: Medicare-for-all offer is ‘closer to Medicaid’
Replacing employer-based word with single-payer medical in America will some-more closely resemble Medicaid than Medicare, argued Fox News writer Dr. Marc Siegel.
Fox News contributor Dr. Marc Siegel, highbrow of medicine during NYU Langone Medical Center, argued Tuesday a “Medicare-for-all” proposal would be “closer to Medicaid” than Medicare.
Speaking on “America’s Newsroom,” Siegel said, “The Democrats are perplexing to figure out if they can get behind this for a 2020 election. My prophecy is, it’s the extreme usually that is going to stay behind this.”
He added, “You can't destroy the employer-based healthcare system. It won’t work in a United States.”
He done a comments as House Democrats hold their first-ever conference on Medicare-for-all legislation on Tuesday, advancing a unconditional offer that several distinguished 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls have embraced.
President Trump and tip Republicans call a thought a socialist medication for disaster.
DEMS TO HOLD FIRST-EVER HEARING ON MEDICARE FOR ALL, AS PROGRESSIVES FEAR ‘DELIBERATION THEATER’ FARCE
The Rules Committee conference concerned the Medicare for All Act of 2019, that promises to fast yield coverage for “all people vital in a U.S.” within dual years, according to a stream breeze of a check and a outline expelled by Washington Democrat Rep. Pramila Jayapal.
The legislation has cumulative a subsidy of some-more than 100 congressional co-sponsors, including New York Rep. Alexandrai Ocasio-Cortez and Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar. Presidential possibilities Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren have permitted some chronicle of a proposal, while Amy Klobuchar has instead upheld usually a open option.
In an op-ed published in USA Today on Tuesday, Siegel wrote, “Medicare-for -all might be a politician’s dream, though it is a doctor-and-patient nightmare.”
He elaborated on that matter on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday, saying, “This morning House Rules Committee authority Jim McGovern says medical is a right for all. That sounds great, right? But let me tell we since that’s a politician’s slogan.”
“What does it meant medical is a right? When we go to a doctor’s office, we wait for an hour, is that a right? You have a large co-pay we can’t afford, is that a right? You got a high deductible, we can’t get the medical we need, is that a right? Paying doctors reduction for doing more where we have to interest to a supervision bureaucracy on high, destroying a healthcare system that right now provides health coverage for 177 million people, a employer-based healthcare system, how does that get us closer to the right to medical for all?”
In his op-ed, Siegel wrote, “As Medicare changes to single-payer, it would turn a some-more rarely regulated limited word that rations care. In other words, it will feel and work some-more like Medicaid than Medicare.”
KAMALA HARRIS DISMISSES CONCERNS OVER MEDICARE FOR ALL: ‘IT’S NOT ABOUT THE COST’
He added, “Waiting lines for procedures, surgeries and treatments would lengthen.”
On “America’s Newsroom” on Tuesday, Siegel elaborated on that point, referencing a Canadian single-payer health complement since he pronounced it’s a indication as to how Medicare-for-all would expected operate in a United States.
“Twenty weeks between a time you see your primary caring doctor like me, 20 weeks between then and receiving caring from a specialist. Twenty weeks! Ten weeks wait for an MRI. I need (a) one day wait for an MRI. If we consider we need an MRI, 10 weeks doesn’t work,” Siegel said.
“CAT scans, 4 weeks, hip surgery, months. A cardiac stent, months. I can’t work within a complement like that as a practicing medicine and that’s since we call it closer to Medicaid.”
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
He added, “We don’t have a same access to creation that we have now. We have private solutions coming, personalized healthcare solutions formed on genetics, formed on robotics, formed on immunotherapy. A one distance fits all clunky insurance isn’t going to be means to cover all of that.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.